Friday, April 16, 2010

The Secrecy Law Scandal; John Aster Exposed

 

The Secrecy Law Scandal

Often when challenged about why the secrecy law is in place, the explanation from Australian Family Courts is to protect children's privacy. Australian Law, based upon English law often mirrors UK in legal matters. Naturally, Australian law mimicking UK law, will also mimic the adverse legal avenue where the Council of Europe found UK law to err on the side of bias when they ordered secrecy. UK wasfound to maintain secrecy, not to protect the children's identity, but to protect the evidence where they violated human rights from the public. This led to media reporting on UK Family Court proceeding including the revelation that a mother wasordered by the court to return to UK where she was murdered by her ex husband whom had made previous threats to kill.

Australian journalists have even spoken out on how the Australian Family Court has stopped journalists from reporting on cases even where children are dead:

Today Tonight producer stated that he had received jail threats over reporting cases where all members where anonymized.

So why do we see media reports on the family court?

In the case of Darcey Freeman, the reporting was so viral that it was reported in the UK and in US, which stretched out of the Family Courts jurisdiction and made such a lawsuit very expensive and ambiguous. Since the release of the above video, other journalists have been able to make anonymized reports on family violence cases without needing to seek the courts permission.

Beforehand, only stories that supported mens groups ideology where provided and reports that involved family violence were required to obtain permission from the courts. In fact three media reporters from three Australian leading newspapers who provided reports from the mens groups ideology where in fact mens rights advocates. It is therefore no wonder why the community attitudes on violence against women and children provided poor results. The belief that women raise violence in the family court to obtain custody is widely held:

Half of all respondents (49 percent)

believed that ‘women going through

custody battles often make up or

exaggerate claims of domestic

violence in order to improve their

case’, and only 28 percent disagreed. - page 8, Changing Attitudes Changing Cultures A National Survey on Community Attitudes to Violence against Women

It is a mystery as to why such a document is able to identify the members and explicit details of a family court case:

Draft)

It is a mystery as to why the details of the mother were revealed on the fathers facebook profile page whom has 672 friends with access to all of the court files that compliment his version of events.

He also identifies the child by providing the photos and the case information underneath. 672 friends can clearly identify the mother and the child, know who judged the case and the details of the case he believes supports his reason for custody. Where he is not identified, he proceeds to identify himself in the case:

It is also important to note that John appeals for his case as an injustice because(according to his account) he had not viewed child pornography for nine years:

The question remains unanswered to the public as to the other remaining years and what police reports was he referring to that he claimed to be untrue?

Then there are the abduction cases where the family court has a high number of fathers looking for mothers whom have absconded with the children. Research has noted that a high number of abduction cases are due to escaping domestic violence and the negligence of protection related to that area. Most abduction cases therefore produce a mens group style promotion, neglecting to add the part where child abuse was raised and not dealt properly dealt with. An excellent example is the case of Melinda Stratton and Ken Thompson. In the court orderedpublication it warned anyone who recognized Melinda Stratton, "not to approach her as she might prove a danger to herself or her son". Unlike other family court releases, it did not specify a criminal or diagnosed mental health history. An aspect that would clearly be important to add when compelling the public to turn a mother and child into the police. It was later revealed that Melinda had run because of her concerns for Andrew Thompson and the courts inability to investigate child abuse. The court of course restrained the Australian from publishing most of the mothers accounts including the allegations that were made.

Posted by Samantha at 4:55 PM

Labels: Australian Family Law, Australian Family Law Act, Harold James Johnson, James Johnson, John Astor, Melinda Stratton, Secrecy, Section 121

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

15 comments:

Lady Portia said...

It is exactly the same in Ireland and has been for the past 15 years. I only know through experience from being inside the secret courts and being gagged from telling the world until now.

AXJ ® PRESS said...

Wow, apparently AXJ ® PRESS in AUSTRALIA has been covering the Court hearing of Mr. John Aster and his appeal to see his daughter and the female judge which works in the same Ministry of Justice as his EX has decided to close down all websites pertaining to Mr. John Aster, including this one.

Mark A. said...

Hi my name is Mark Winter. I have seen the files of John Aster personally. This is a smear of his name. Of the 9 years history contained on the many computers there was no child porn otherwise he would have been charged and convicted.

I apprecaite all attacks that Child Porn and peadophiles are the most disgusting trash out there.

His ex works for the department of justice, and his judge is allegedly committing and condoning criminal activies & offences. Both his ex and the judical officers namely Magistrate Demack.

Search her name on Youtube and Google and you will be very supprised.

best regards,

Mark Winter

Lukes Army said...

Hello Mark, I have spent the last seven days investigating and gathering information posted by John Aster himself within his numerous profiles on facebook. He deceives people by having more than one profile, as can be seen with the comment on this page, AXJ Press.

I am right up to date on John. This is how he cons people into believing what he says has credibility, by talking to himself and giving himself a pat on the back.

We are all on facebook and we all know, anyone who does this is a skumbag.

Now let's start with AXJ shall we, let me tell you what I have deduced by my investigations....What a fuckin Joke.

I am not just saying it's a joke, please read these posts by John Aster and please, somebody tell me how he has fooled so many people.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17627&id=122323821160049

Lukes Army said...

I am not just saying it's a joke, please read these posts by John Aster and please, somebody tell me how he has fooled so many people.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17627&id=122323821160049

The only fruitcake is John Aster, and anyone gullible or unintelligent enough to follow him.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17618&id=122323821160049

Here are some pretty strong indicators that the pedophile accusations are credible.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17027&id=122323821160049

Lukes Army said...

Getting back to Michelle Stewarts allegations that John informed her, I was contacted by Michelle after this occurred when John skighted too her during their phone call how sick these picks were.

Children who had been killed during the making of these disgusting images and movies.

John knew Michelle Stewart and I were close allies, we have both had son's who died in suspicious circumstances while in foster care.

John knew he had some explaining to do to me, and lied to me, but still admitted he was caught with porn on his computet, but claimed it was left there by his border while he was overseas.

It wasn't until I was contacted by a federal police officer and filled in on just about everything, even given a link to the news report, that it all became clear to me.

Even so, I refrained from being drawn into Johns stream of confrontations across the internet, where he attacked all who questioned his authenticity with blatant lies and cruel accusations.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17003&id=122323821160049

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17014&id=122323821160049

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17011&id=122323821160049

Lukes Army said...

The reason John will never see his child again is that the judge in John's case knows from looking at his criminal record that John has been convicted for possession of child porn.

He was so deeply into it that he was part of a pedophile ring, and when he was caught he dobbed them all in. I get the feeling that John thinks this action overides the fact that he was caught with porn, in his mind he should be commended for dobbing in a pedophile ring, even if he was part of it.

So no conviction was recorded for Johny boy, but it is still their on his criminal history printout.
There are many who refuse to acknowledge any evidence or claime with regards to John's criminal history, claiming insufficient evidence. That is admirable to keep an open mind.

What I cannot condone, and what I can no longer sit by and watch, is the harrassment, stalking, personal attack and blatant lies and slander by John which have been aimed at children's rights crusaders who, unlike John have earned their credibility and respect.

One of John's victim's, Freda Briggs was awarded Australian of the year for her contributions to abused children, having written several books on the subject. This woman does not deserve to be talked to like this, and I will sit by and watch no more.

Come play with the big boys John
Aster......Exposed.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=17027&id=122323821160049

Any other questions????

Lukes Army said...

Pete Geary fights back...

http://www.facebook.com/search.php?q=whistleblower+act+exposed&init=quick&tas=search_preload#!/note.php?note_id=10150310983920061&comments&notif_t=note_reply

Sabine K McNeill said...

In the UK, I've been subjected to two "injunctions" because I published details about two different "social" services taking two children.

Now I've published this petition "The Secrecy of the Law Courts should be lifted NOW" which Jane Davies in West Wales started in the street. See http://bit.ly/kExfF1

AXJ said...

You have no evidence about what you are posting regarding JOHN ASTER but these is solid evidence against JOHN HANS ANDERSON who is a convicted criminal in CANADA.

Michael Borusiewicz said...

I know this... Only a dickhead would use the AXJ logo, they have the worst reputation world wide as scammers, mainly due to association with John Aster, my cousin, the biggest scum bag on the net who next time I see I am going to snap his little pedeophile neck and do the world a favor. You wait cunt.

Michael Borusiewicz said...

AXJ ® PRESS said...

Wow, apparently AXJ ® PRESS in AUSTRALIA has been covering the Court hearing of Mr. John Aster and his appeal to see his daughter and the female judge which works in the same Ministry of Justice as his EX has decided to close down all websites pertaining to Mr. John Aster, including this one

Wow apparantly AXJ Press is as full of shit as the rest of AXJ.

Your a dickhead john pedeophile aster. Can't wait to see you maggot scum.

Michael Borusiewicz said...

AXJ ® PRESS said...

Wow, apparently AXJ ® PRESS in AUSTRALIA has been covering the Court hearing of Mr. John Aster and his appeal to see his daughter and the female judge which works in the same Ministry of Justice as his EX has decided to close down all websites pertaining to Mr. John Aster, including this one

Wow apparantly AXJ Press is as full of shit as the rest of AXJ.

Your a dickhead john pedeophile aster. Can't wait to see you maggot scum.

BUACA said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kstar:)))) said...

Im goimg through family court at the moment and im a single mum with two kids i relocated to escape terrible things and my oldest childs father has just gained custody of my oldest child after me being the primary carer all of the childs life bar nine weeks... his family are loaded and his stepdad is a lawyer owns his own firm and worked in the same federal court circuit as the family reporter... i cant get legal aid of course im off to trial in feb 2014 im exhausted devastated and still have another child to try and make life normal for plus ive just found out im pregnant.. im so bewildered as to where to turn all the evidence points to im a great mum but money talks corruption goes all the way to the top